We live in an age of mass analytics; one where quantification just about equates to qualification. We have statistics for our listening habits, our sleep cycles, even our hangouts with friends. We track workouts and caloric intake and rate books, movies, and restaurants. Everything about our lives has a number to it. Which, for better or worse, makes it all the more obvious when something is lacking.
The benefit to this, of course, is that we can quickly address the identified needs. But we have lost the boundary, in our age of information, between what needs to happen, what should happen, and what we’d like to happen. The requirements for what is “enough” are all vague and arbitrary, making resources that should be aiding us in our physical, spiritual, emotional, and financial goals a constant source of anxiety. Plus, we struggle against our own expectations. We have become all the more aware when our favorite songs aren’t as enjoyable, or when the pounds we worked so hard to shed quickly return. What could be an opportunity for balance has instead developed into thoughts of, “I should be doing more” and, “I’m still not where I want to be.”
The trouble is not so much in the statistics we have come to live and breathe, but with the nature of the world itself. The second law of thermodynamics establishes the concept of entropy: it states that despite the conservation of energy, all natural processes trend towards a growing disorder in the universe. In other words, there is a loss in every action taken—and no process is truly reversible. What we’ve discovered is that the universe is hard-wired towards chaos—which is something you and I feel not only in the physics of our lives, but also in our relationships with ourselves and others. We continue to miscommunicate, struggle to share our feelings, let the worst parts of us take control. It feels like a battle that we can’t win. Perhaps, we can’t; perhaps, no matter what, the best we can do will only just be thinning the margin of loss.
This feeling that the rope we’re hanging on to is about to snap is the scarcity mindset in a nutshell. Traditionally, a scarcity mindset is defined by a shift in perspective to focus on short-term needs that disregards any long-term impacts. But it applies in a broader range, too; ultimately, it’s a reactionary fear response. When we perceive that there is not enough of a resource for everyone, we begin to look out only for ourselves. It asks us to create comparisons, and those comparisons create divisions. It’s why tribalism has been so successful within MAGA: “I have to watch out for me and mine, so the problem must be with you and yours.”
The remedy, then, is to adopt a perspective of abundance—to act out of a belief that there is, in fact, enough to go around. It’s a mindset that fosters cooperation and gratitude rather than mongering fear and suspicion. Many people consider this to be the headspace that we should operate in as believers. Which is fantastic, problem solved; until you can’t make rent, or you get laid off, or you lose a friend to opiod addiction. It’s one thing to shake off the drivel of inconveniece and to learn contentment; it is entirely another to try to stay afloat after having life-changing grief thrust in your face.
In my final year of high school, one of my closest friends was killed in an altercation attributed to gang violence. How do you respond to that type of grief as an individual? It is an insurmountable event. It is not just a closed door—it is a wall. The weight of an unchangeable world is a heavy burden. And it is a burden that grows each day, watching helpless as these continued crushing defeats compound on both a local and global scale.
This is where I find the abundance mindset lacking. How do we lead a life believing that there is enough of what we want—be it money, joy, time, etc.—when those things are clearly and consistently being rent from our hands and the hands of the ones we love? I don’t doubt that acceptance is the path forward—but I think that there must be grace in the intermediary period when loss lingers so closely in front of our eyes.
In the week before his death, a woman (some accounts name her Mary) came to Jesus while he was dining and poured perfume worth a year’s wages on his head and feet. Some of his disciples, who were eating with him, began to chide the woman for this, considering it a wasteful and unnecessary act. “Why was the ointment wasted in this way?” They asked. “‘For this ointment could have been sold for more than three hundred denarii and the money given to the poor.’” But Jesus in turn begins to scold them; actually it is they that have got it all wrong.
It is easy to assume that the disciples (namely, Judas, who agrees to betray Jesus immediately following this encounter) are thinking not of goodwill but of greed in this moment. But consider their position: they are still learning to act like Jesus without having fully grasped the nature of the kingdom He is building. They have been witnessing the most remote depths of human need as a part of their daily lives for years. They have seen the heights of despair. And they have seen Jesus tell people like the rich young ruler that he must give everything away to be a part of their community. To them, it is not unreasonable to think that the world is not an equitable place. To them, there is need to fight tooth and nail to make every small and noble action as significant as possible.
This is where Jesus meets them and us. He acknowledges that the world is indeed a brutal and terrifying place of ever-increasing chaos. He tells them that they will always have the poor with them. That there is no end in sight. But, he says, that isn’t the point. My kingdom is one that works by a different standard. The power it holds is only perfected in sacrifice. The life you have been given in me is meant to be spent, used up, laid down.
What is being forgotten is that the despair these men have borne witness to is not the full story. For each scene of depravity, loss, and grief they saw, there was redemption, healing, and blessing in equal measure. In Galilee, they arrived to a crowd of thousands with no more fish and bread than would feed half their own rank. Yet, they left that shore knowing that each person that had heard the words of their master could have eaten no more. They were powerless as Jairus wept over the loss of his daughter. But later that same day, they watch as he claps and laughs and dances with her, alive again. They, like all of us, throw out the baby with the bathwater; focusing so intently on their needs that they forget that in the past, those needs have been met every single time.
The perspective of scarcity has led the disciples to see the situation in a black-and-white way; not dissimilar, even, to the reactions we often see from the religious elite in the gospel accounts. In the same way that the Pharisees so often accuse, slander, and belittle those in social poverty, the disciples are now leaning on an almost legalistic framing of this situation surrounding financial poverty. We must beware, Jesus says, of losing all hope of action by prescribing unachievable requirements to the methods by which we act. There will be no change, futile as that change may be, without action.
There is no use in trying to trick ourselves into thinking that the world around us is going to fix itself. It won’t, at least by the standards we set for it. No matter how much effort we can collectively muster, the problems we bear witness to are not going away. Yes, the poor will always be with us, because no amount will ever be enough. Only the infinite vastness that we long for will satisfy. But that is not a reason to refuse life itself—to walk solemnly with your head down, trying to forge whatever meager existence you can find in a world of utter desperation. You must recognize that this is where we are, yes, but it is not where we will always be. That the crushing weight you feel is not the full story. The kingdom we seek to join is one of paradox. In it, there is abundance in each limited thing.
The poet John Keats was a man to whom nothing good seemed to happen. When he was 8, his father died falling from his horse. At 14, his mother died from tuberculosis, leaving him to care for his younger brother, Tom, who had also become tubercular. Tom later died when John was 22. Keats himself died of tuberculosis, his "family disease,” at 25. By then, he had given up a career in medicine to pursue poetry. Keats’ writing was in publication for just four years when he died, and it is estimated that he had sold only 200 copies of any of his works at that time. He was convinced he had left no impact on the world; that he was a complete and utter failure. Yet, just as the woman who anointed Jesus, he is remembered even now; entirely because he believed so deeply in doing what he could with the gift and joy he had found in writing. I’d like to close with an excerpt from Book 1 of his poem, Endymion, which seems to me very apt:
Therefore, on every morrow, are we wreathing
A flowery band to bind us to the earth,
Spite of despondence, of the inhuman dearth
Of noble natures, of the gloomy days,
Of all the unhealthy and o'er-darkened ways
Made for our searching: yes, in spite of all,
Some shape of beauty moves away the pall
From our dark spirits.